Have Your Say
Contact INK Direct
measuremeas·ure [ méər ] noun (plural meas·ures) 1. size: the size or extent of something, especially in comparison with a known standard 2. standard used for figuring size: a standard used for determining the dimensions, area, volume, or weight of something 3. system for determining size: a particular system used to determine the dimensions, area, volume, or weight of something 4. unit in system: a unit in a system that is used to determine the dimensions, area, volume, or weight of something 5. something used to figure quantity: something used to determine a quantity, e.g. a ruler, or a small container that holds a known volume 6. way of evaluating: a way of evaluating something, or a standard against which something can be compared 7. action taken: an action taken to make something happen or prevent something ( often used in the plural ) to take precautionary measures 8. standard amount of something: a standard amount of something, e.g. of an alcoholic beverage poured into a glass for drinking 9. degree of something: an extent or amount that is limited, appropriate, or has its size specified Their help contributed in no small measure to our success. 10. limits: a limit or limits, especially one that is reasonable or appropriate His rage had no measure. 11. music Same as bar1n (sense 14) 12. law: a bill to be enacted into law, or a law that has been enacted 13. poetic meter: the rhythm of a piece of poetry 14. metrical foot: a unit of meter in poetry 15. ( archaic ) Same as dancev (sense 1) plural noun meas·ures mineral extract geology rock layers: strata of rock, especially when they contain a particular material You can help homelessINK pay for start-up costs and expenses by usingYour help is both needed and appreciated. |
|
A PeoplePeople are are dynamic, interacting with each other and transforming according to kind. They sort themselves. Students, drunks, or drunken students. Homeless people, homeless students, or homeless New Yorkers. Each sort/form a different crowd, mob, audience, or City.
|
|
A "one time only" deal. What you see is what you get. As it happens it changes. It's so new, it changes the universe that it is in. "Homelessness is the condition of people who lack regular legal access to adequate housing.""Precise numbers are
impossible to collect because researchers define homelessness in
different ways and because the homeless are transitory. The number of
people predicted to become homeless in any given year is estimated to
be three to five times the number of people who are homeless at any
given moment. The U.S. Census Bureau attempted to count homeless
people in the 1990 census. However, most analysts regard this attempt
as a failure."
|
What's HOME?eggingyouon$*******STROOP##*NYCitySITE&landofthefreeHSBG>theBAG
Motherless mONKEY
| |||||
|
If you have enough discretionary income to buy tickets to hit shows, concerts or sporting events, then you are in a position to help "homeless" people make a "home" in New York City. You are also able to save some of your money in exchange for some of your time. To do this join a Your participation will give you access to most "anything that happens".. This means tickets to most any theatrical event, sporting event or concert in New York City. You will also earn points toward discounted pricing on premium seating to events of your choosing. These survey groups will be kept to a limited number of participants. You have a realistic chance to get the free tickets awarded on a random basis. Ticket points, awarded for exceptional answers or clever observations, will give added punch to your entertainment dollar by upgrading the quality of your seating. Call and ask about currently available tickets and information about openings in on-going and upcoming surveys. |
|
Homeless People, create waste as a by-product of any activity they may regularly perform. They and their waste accumulate, like so much compost, but not as useful, and far more malodorous. The more "homeless" people that gather the more the situation stinks. This is where it seems one might start if there were to be a dialouge, rather than a diktat. If you are intending on working with someone you would want them groomed, and and up to the standards you hold in your "game". If you intend to isolate and eliminate someone from the situation as quickly as you can, then... "it matters not the nature of your product." As long as you think they are off to "somewhere else" it's not your problem. What if there is no "somewhere else"? What if the planet was like a boat? What happens if you put all the homeless into one spot and line them up to wait... the boat would tip over. This comes about because unlike animals in a natural habitat, homeless people are entraped. There is only an unspeakable place for them in this ecologicaly incomplete economic system.
Simply put, we are talking readily available public bathing facilities. No membership required. No "program" as a prerequisite.
|
|
Homeless:
This accounts for the broad range of humanity that one can find in the "homeless" population. In theory this happens at an even distribution, But then... after a time the "homelessness" wears off, one settles and works their way through and out, or whatever, the person "gets over it". But meanwhile "back at the ranch"... somewhere another homeless person appears. That is why there are so many different people. A brief aside about the relativity of luck. An easy example is a broken leg that can spoil the plans of a rich man, or, finding twenty dollars when penniless and hungry and homeless. Which is the luckier of the two, the rich one or the poor one? Happiness and pain are relative and what you consider to be fortunate may not be so for the other guy, or gal. What if the broken leg got you out of a bad marriage or you spent the twenty on bad drugs and died, what then? Who's lucky?
Random events like the particles of gas contained in a balloon.Statistically a certain number will impact on the interior surface at any given instant, then to be replaced by others an instant later... it is not indiviual atoms holding the balloon out, like little Dutch boys with a finger in the dyke. It is the random action of all of them. Homeless or not! Random events like particles of a gas in a balloon. Statistically a certain number will impact on the interior surface at any given instant, then to be replaced by others an instant later... it is not indiviual atoms holding the balloon out, like little Dutch boys with a finger in the dyke. It is the random action of all of them. Homeless or not! |
|
wHAT DOES the |
"isolated" physical subsystems need not possess "properties" in their own right.
To date none of these experiments has produced any evidence for the breakdown of quantum mechanics. Indeed, in experiments where the parameters are well controlled, the agreement between experiment and the predictions of quantum theory has been quite satisfying. However, it is important to appreciate that no experiment to date has definitively excluded a "macrorealistic" view of the world in which a macroscopic object is in a definite macroscopic state at all times. The macrorealistic view is, needless to say, incompatible with the quantum picture."
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/
Homeless people do not remain psycologicaly "homeless" for long. Even though they "know" it is temporary, their shelter becomes a "home"! "Anywhere else but the shelter", is the idea behind this proceedure. And it is fertile ground for slop-sink homeless thinking. The staff as well as the "clients" suffer from this. For the staff it is an excuse to mistreat people because they are a commodity to be "processed". Helter Shelter-Inside the City's Dreaded Dumping Ground for the Homeless-
by Geoffrey Gray-August 21 - 27, 2002-
This is in New York City, less than two years ago. My question to Mayor Mike and Commissioner Gibbs is... "What is there to improve?".
The Comish jokes in the press that homelessness is "not rocket science", and this is partly true, but misleading.
First. Building a system, founding a community, or funding building maintenence to do one thing or another, is not what we what we are talking about. The shelter facilities are like City Hall or the Mayor's mansion. Are there "little piles" of poop turning up there? If they do, is it difficult is it to clean them up? No.
It is the quality of the available behavioral options, what actions people are forced to take due to environmental conditions, that creates this squalidity.
On the other hand, as with rocket science people's lives are at stake in the outcome. Extra care must be taken because the outcome is not reversible and there are limited windows for success.
Because life and death consequences are at stake, rocket scientists take care in what they do. It is important. Brain, heart, or any surgery. How about the brakes on your car or the school bus? What makes the "homeless" so inconsequential as people?
Like particles, homeless people appear and then disappear, they are of extremely short duration. What happens is that an individual formalizes into a "homeless" situation. Their personal moorings having been severed, they were socially cut loose. Naturaly they seek to re-establish them. The City on the other hand, can not abide this wave collapse. If too many homeless people appear in any given area, the city has a "homeless situation". Witness the shelters. They are not designed to "shelter" (humanely or otherwise). They are designed as containment facilities. What happens when the free range and "shelter resistant" people start measuring a place for themselves, is that the City must then re-accelerate them in order to disperse the "homeless" energy: so that it cannot build into localized power. Keep them in motion, if not, then their actual numbers would become apparent. As their mass builds, and the gravity of the situation becomes critical, it begins to distort established political interests. *** |
"This is where we examine "quantum effects" on a shattered individual, and how they "play out" socially and economically in New York City"Whether or not this analogy can be developed into a "model" is yet to be seen. So far from what I see, the "Alice in Wonderland" like Quantum world, is pretty much a "common sense" description of the everyday social life of humans. Tell me what I'm missing? The Spin? The "wave collapse"? Maybe social and personal "entanglements"?
Or my favorite, the "black hole of poverty".
|
http://homelessink.tripod.com/mocamint.gif Head: Where it begins... where it finishes.
You can help homelessINK pay for start-up costs and expenses by usingYour help is both needed and appreciated.

pocket n. pockets < 'pâkit > : 1. A small pouch in a garment for carrying small articles. 2. A supply of money; "they dipped into the taxpayers' pockets." [ETYM: Old Eng. poket, Prov. French & Old Fren. poquette, French pochette, dim. from poque, pouque, French poche; probably of Teutonic origin. Related to Poke a pocket, and cf. Poach to cook eggs, to plunder, and Pouch.]
homelessECONOMICSWHY CAN'T I GET TICKETS?REPORT ON TICKET DISTRIBUTION PRACTICES Did you ever wonder where the ticket-brokers of "hot" hit Broadway shows get those tickets? Diggers!"What are diggers?", you may be asking yourself. They are people who stand waiting in line for long hours to buy tickets. Usually, but not always they are homeless people! In New York when tickets go on sale, the lines are long if it is an important event. Most likely the first tickets bought will be bought by a homeless person. Or, even more likely, the first one hundred ticket punches will be bought homeless people buying tickets for an agency. People with productive jobs cannot afford to camp out all night (and somtimes for days, i.e., World Series tickets that freaquently go on sale in New York). This is why they pay the brokers a premium over the price of the ticket. Easy example is the lawyer who makes $350 an hour. For such, an "over-nighter" would put the price in the range of a small car. Yet the one-hundred and fifty dollars the homeless person earns make him rich for a day! (Location, location is everything. Same cardboard, in front of a theater, for a homeless person, sleep becomes over-night work.) So at the bottom of the economic ticket chain, sits, a waiting homeless person It's beauty is in it's completeness and simplicity.What could be simpler than an egg? But when you come down to it, what have you got? It goes nowhere. Does nothing. If all you know is what you see, it's pointless. In and of it's self, it is useless. This is what happens when you isolate, or "select out", a "homeless person". They go nowhere, and they do nothing. Now why is that? Yet, if you put the egg into a context, suddenly... ...you have an uderstanding. If you are a farmer, it's next years chicken. For me it's breakfast. And so we see the homeless problem. For the City it is to move them out of "public" areas that they can leagaly occupy. For me it's understanding why, if you are going to have homeless people, why won't you let them be clean? Perhaps give them a place to rest? A little peace, alittle Time to think. As objectified and particularized, homeless people are a problem because there is no contextual understanding. Given the Schrodinger/Heisenberg! "spin" they are part of a social wave, and ongoing and active work of public developement and social improvement, or not.
|
An encyclopedia of current events with news feeds and research links ...connecting the dots...
SHELTER:commingSOON...
Shelter From the Storm a thin cardboard box
background="http://homelessink.tripod.com/31green.gif">
Between Hope and Hard Times:
"If the American Dream can be said to have a home, it’s New York. The rich history of the state stretches from revolutionary times through the tremendous economic expansion of the Erie Canal to the construction of audacious skyscrapers and the greatest wealth-generating apparatus the world has ever seen. For Irish families fleeing the potato famine of the 1840s, for African- Americans trekking north during the Great Migration of the 20th century, and for immigrants today arriving from all corners of the globe, New York has always embodied American aspirations for a better life." "One of the largely hidden benefits of welfare reform in the mid-1990s was that it finally helped demolish the pernicious myth of the “parasitic poor.” As millions of single mothers and others joined the workforce, a more accurate image emerged: ambitious, hard-working Americans who wanted to join the mainstream of working life and feel the pride of caring for themselves and their families. In a sense, welfare reform issued the same challenge as always to the worst-off in our society: Make the often-arduous efforts to improve yourselves and it will pay dividends. If we as a society fail to live up to our end of that bargain, we let down not only those millions fighting every day to improve their own lives, but our own shared faith that such efforts should be rewarded."
|
|
Behavior is the place
where changes and improvements are made in the quality of ones life
http://homelessink.tripod.com/a9grid.gif
STROOP
|
-------------------- City tracks hidden homeless -------------------- Head count will help Chicago vie for millions in federal funds By Patrick Rucker Tribune staff reporter January 29, 2005
The woman peeked out from a cardboard parapet as Jim Bracey strode
toward her makeshift home among the litter and scattering rats under
the Dan Ryan Expressway.
"This is Betty's house," Bracey said.
Bracey, a Salvation Army chaplain, has visited the spot a hundred
times before. This time he brought along a clipboard.
For three hours in the bitter cold Thursday night, Bracey and some
400 census takers from the city of Chicago and 11 non-profit agencies
roamed dark urban corners to find the most elusive homeless.
The head count was replicated in dozens of cities in the nation this
week to help the Department of Housing and Urban Development decide
how it will allocate $1.4 billion in federal aid.
HUD has never before sought such a standardized count of the nation's
homeless, said department spokesman Brian Sullivan. "It is a way for
us to get uniformity in the data," Sullivan said.
Chicago received about $40 million in HUD funding for homelessness
last year--over half of the state's allotment of $73 million. City
officials estimate there are 9,600 homeless people in Chicago;
activists for the homeless estimate the population at about 15,000 in
a city with only 6,000 beds at shelters.
Now that the census is done, researchers from the city Department of
Human Services and Roosevelt University's Institute for Metropolitan
Affairs will process the raw data into hard numbers.
That process is likely to take several weeks, human services
officials said. Chicago's numbers will be added to those of Miami,
Los Angeles, Oklahoma City and dozens of other municipalities that
conducted a "point in time" snapshot of their homeless problem.
"Because of the way we collected the data--using a sampling
method--it will be several weeks before we have any conclusions,"
said Cindy Collins, director of grants and research for the Human
Services Department. She helped develop the census questionnaire and
sampling methodology and will help with the analysis.
Bracey led a band of about eight volunteers who found 12 homeless
people, mostly men, while searching on foot under bridges and highway
overpasses and in abandoned buildings around the city's University
Village and Pilsen neighborhoods.
Betty Strickland's cardboard lean-to was their first stop. They found
her there, along with her companion, Willie, sitting next to a small
fire.
A cheerful woman of 43, Strickland emerged wearing six sweaters and
an overcoat.
"I'm just trying to stay warm," Strickland said with a half-smile,
her nook packed with six blankets.
On CTA trains and buses, in emergency rooms, late-night laundries and
restaurants, the volunteer canvassers were on the lookout for people
like Strickland--the unseen homeless who routinely eschew shelters
and live rough on the street no matter what their health is, no
matter what the weather.
According to HUD guidelines, the homeless count was conducted in the
final week of January--when weather is bitter and shelters are near
capacity.
When the Chicago volunteers came upon a willing subject, they
interviewed the homeless person according to an 18-point
questionnaire on lifestyle, health and personal history.
Homeless people who were found sleeping or who declined to cooperate
also were noted in the tally.
Besides helping city officials compete for HUD funding, the census
information is expected to yield clues to help realize Mayor Richard
Daley's campaign to end homelessness in 10 years--an initiative that
started in 2003.
"Once we get the data analyzed, it will inform our work immediately,"
said Ellen Sahli, Daley's liaison on homelessness and supportive
housing. "The HUD application is only part of its usefulness."
Bracey, once homeless himself, looked for telltale signs that a
homeless person was living nearby, such as errant grocery carts,
stray bicycles, piles of debris and unexplained smoke rising from
unlikely spaces.
"I've seen people in corners and crevices that you'd never expect
someone could sleep," Bracey said.
He has found people under train trestles and overturned canoes, in
trash bins and freight cars.
On nights like Thursday, when the temperature dropped to 14 degrees,
many indigent people go to city warming centers or other indoor sites.
Those who remain on the streets are some of the least likely to seek
public aid, Bracey said. They may be dealing with mental illness,
fear, dedication to a companion, drug dependency or pride.
Knowing how many people are unwilling to seek help is crucial to
eliminating homelessness, Sahli said.
"That information is important for designing new programs," she said.
"Why aren't people using shelters? What is the need there that we are
not responding to?"
In the conventional view, shelters are the gateway to getting
homeless people access to other services.
"Our long-term goal is to get these people into permanent housing,
but we believe part of doing that means finding them where they are,"
Sahli said.
According to the HUD guidelines, volunteers counted people living in
conditions considered "unfit for human habitation."
That description is apt for the home Betty Strickland and her
companion have made for themselves, Bracey said.
"I've seen people in these situations before. Often it takes a
tragedy--like one of them dying--before people like that come in. I
hope it does not come to that."
|
http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/ html/nypd/html/3100/retro.html |
Some Background from Columbia School of Journalism
|
Since the early 20th century, the various administrations of New York City have restructured the social service bureaucracy over and over, attempting to provide support to the city's poorest citizens. At the turn of the century, the agency was called the Department of Public Charities. It later became the Department of Welfare and eventually the Human Resources Administration. Yet with each restructuring, the core deficiencies of the system have remained the same, and people have been left without the support they need to escape poverty. Even in the midst of the unprecedented wealth of the twenty-first century, the city's public assistance system today is plagued by many of the same problems it faced 50 years ago. According to dozens of academic and government reports, lawsuits, audits and interviews with former and current social service administrators and employees, the HRA has been beset by overloaded and under-trained caseworkers, inadequate equipment and facilities, lack of oversight of contractors and breakdowns in communication within and between city agencies. Other than some steps taken by Eggleston and the previous HRA Commissioner, Jason Turner, to improve the agency's computer systems, intra-agency communication and staff training, many of the core problems had not changed by the spring of 2003. The most impoverished New Yorkers have to deal with this agency in order to get the food, medicine and other services they need to survive. HRA's dysfunction has only added to the dysfunction of the lives of the poor. |
Homeless Family, circa. 1930 |
http://albethere.tripod.com/tendollardeal.htmlOppression and Social Intervention
Ira Goldenberg/Nelson Hall Chicago/1978
Your Chance To Win! |
|
People, create waste as a by-product of any activity they may regularly perform. They and their waste accumulate, like so much compost, but not as useful, and far more malodorous. This is why great pains are taken to to teach children to groom themselves. The more "homeless" people gather in one place the more a situation stinks. This is because it is not seemly to groom in public, and some natural personal behavior that is quite acceptable in private is forbidden and punished if done in public. If you are "really" going to set to work on ending homelessness, this is where it seems one might start. As a practical matter. Think, a shower and clean sox. How it makes you feel in the morning... and how it makes you feel if you miss it. Then try to smile while you shake hands with someone (if you care to get that close) after not having showered or removed from your body any clothing for a week. If that seems a lot just sleep with your clothes on, and then, go though a single day. Do it twice. The physical relief and well being you feel is not a luxury, it is.. health. Need I say more? Feeling good is not a matter of ornament. If you are healthy you feel good. It's very much like breathing, you don't know how good you feel until you are stopped. If there were to be a dialouge between the homeless who are "encouraged" to obey the Mayor's... begins...What if instead of just the homeless on the street Billionaire Mike decided to end middle-classness in parts of this City if not everywhere? The subways would be just fine, if only butlers, nannies and houseboys were here to use them. The consumers who come to the city for the pretend tour, will have ample cab availability, because everyone else will have a car and driver.This is what is lost in the hype. Homelessness is a life-style. Where you go, who you see, what you do. these are things that fill real days. What the Mayor is doing is withdrawing resources from those in need in order to provide something ten years down the line. That's like telling a drowning man, "You see this air I'm giving you now? You can get it over there later. If you make it!"Those dependant on his integrity have no choice. But those who chose freedom over oppression will not come off the streets. And if you are concerned about your tax money, rest assured that it will be spent. Consider the impossibility of such a foolish claim. If you took all the people off the street in an instant, poof, over time more will fill the vacumn created. What the mayor is doing is preperatory propganda to mislead the public, thus allowing him to use force and intimidation to coerce the people on the street into giving up their freedom.He offers nothing in return for this loss of freedom. Just confinement. Where once you had a daily life that God presented to you "live" and fresh, now all opportunity is filtered though a "program".From what I see, the "shelter" life-style the Mayor dictates for anyone not in his "they count" class of people, produces dirty, unhappy, and pointless people. Whereas: the people living in the street are clever and self-starting enough to keep up economically with the rest of New York while managing to live without private personal shelter.If you are intending on working with someone you would want them groomed, and and up to the standards you hold in your "game". If you intend to isolate and eliminate someone from the situation as quickly as you can, then... "good ridance to bad rubbish." As long as you think they are off to "somewhere else" it's not your problem.
What if there is no "somewhere else"? What if the planet was like a boat? What happens if you put all the homeless into one spot and line them up to wait... the boat would tip over.
This comes about because unlike animals in a natural habitat,
Simply put, we are talking readily available public bathing facilities. No membership required. No "program" as a prerequisite.
close |
![]()
|
beginsA Short History of Bathing |
|
|