*
Have Your Say
Contact INK Direct
"Electrons jump at random from one energy state to another state which they could never reach except that their energy is momentarily uncertain.
"The Uncertainty Principle isn't "merely" philosophy."
measure

meas·ure [ méər ] noun (plural meas·ures) 1. size: the size or extent of something, especially in comparison with a known standard 2. standard used for figuring size: a standard used for determining the dimensions, area, volume, or weight of something 3. system for determining size: a particular system used to determine the dimensions, area, volume, or weight of something 4. unit in system: a unit in a system that is used to determine the dimensions, area, volume, or weight of something 5. something used to figure quantity: something used to determine a quantity, e.g. a ruler, or a small container that holds a known volume 6. way of evaluating: a way of evaluating something, or a standard against which something can be compared 7. action taken: an action taken to make something happen or prevent something ( often used in the plural ) to take precautionary measures 8. standard amount of something: a standard amount of something, e.g. of an alcoholic beverage poured into a glass for drinking 9. degree of something: an extent or amount that is limited, appropriate, or has its size specified Their help contributed in no small measure to our success. 10. limits: a limit or limits, especially one that is reasonable or appropriate His rage had no measure. 11. music Same as bar1n (sense 14) 12. law: a bill to be enacted into law, or a law that has been enacted 13. poetic meter: the rhythm of a piece of poetry 14. metrical foot: a unit of meter in poetry 15. ( archaic ) Same as dancev (sense 1) plural noun meas·ures mineral extract geology rock layers: strata of rock, especially when they contain a particular material

You can help homelessINK pay for
start-up costs and expenses by using
Your help is both needed and appreciated.
verb (past and past participle meas·ured, present participle meas·ur·ing, 3rd person present singular meas·ures) 1. transitive verb find size or quantity of something: to find out the size, length, quantity, or rate of something using a suitable instrument or device 2. transitive verb be particular size, length, quantity: to be a particular size, length, quantity, or rate 3. transitive verb assess something: to assess the effect or quality of something, often against a standard You can't measure a hospital just by its facilities. 4. transitive verb determine somebody's size for clothes: to determine somebody's size in order to make a garment or garments that will fit She was being measured for her wedding dress. 5. transitive verb compare something: to compare the size, effect, or quality of something with another thing The champion needs to measure his skill against a worthy challenger. 6. transitive verb adjust something for effect: to adjust something so that it is suitable or effective He measured his punch exactly to catch his opponent on the jaw. 7. intransitive verb journey: to travel a particular distance ( archaic ) [12th century. Via French mesure < Latin mensura < mens-, past participle of metiri "measure"] meas·ur·ern beyond measure very greatly or to an enormous extent for good measure as something extra to the amount required, especially to make sure of something get or have or take somebody's measure to arrive at an accurate assessment of somebody's qualities or abilities

A
City is a measure of it's people as well as place to do business, build a home, or seek shelter...

People

People are are dynamic, interacting with each other and transforming according to kind. They sort themselves.

Students, drunks, or drunken students. Homeless people, homeless students, or homeless New Yorkers. Each sort/form a different crowd, mob, audience, or City.

  • If we sart with the smallest social measure we have, let us call it a "person".

    A single individual person, socially unconnected, is an artificial creation. If you find such a person, they have become "connected" to you.

  • Currently "homeless" is a set of behaviors elicited by social pressure to conform to an idea in a persons head. It is something not commonly found in nature. Like a single bird or an individual egg. The more alone a the shorter it's existance. We all "came" from somewhere, whether we are "going" somewhere or not.
  • A single person can only exist for very short periods of time;picture an infant... alone, an uneducated child can survive a little longer, if you make it to a hundred you better have some friends or a lot of money (even then you need someone connected to play the buy-sell interchange). Society is built on a larger units, let's call them "families".
  • When considering "people" we are refering to individuals (particles in a Quantum-like social universe.) who can be considered to have a greater potential when they become dynamic by grouping into more stable and lasting measurements (atoms, molecules, protiens and voters, even.) One example... a homeless person is one of the poor. But a homeless modifier early on amaleriates the diagnosis. For instance: a homeless musician; may or may not be one of the poor. Opportunity to be unemployed. Homeless, by it's self leaves you like a poop on the Mayors desk.
Here in New York City we have an "official" count that continues to muffle the truth. The number the Mayor puts forward is an estimate,the raw data this estimate is based on are not revealed. "After adding the quality assurance adjustment ... 1,805 street homeless individuals were estimated to be in Manhattan"
City Says:The Official Version
A "one time only" deal. What you see is what you get. As it happens it changes. It's so new, it changes the universe that it is in.

This change can be seen. Your contribution shows. You can build on what you have done before.

"Homelessness is the condition of people who lack regular legal access to adequate housing."

"Precise numbers are impossible to collect because researchers define homelessness in different ways and because the homeless are transitory. The number of people predicted to become homeless in any given year is estimated to be three to five times the number of people who are homeless at any given moment. The U.S. Census Bureau attempted to count homeless people in the 1990 census. However, most analysts regard this attempt as a failure."


What's HOME?eggingyouon$*******STROOP##*NYCitySITE&landofthefreeHSBG>theBAG
This affects a persons behavior like gravity... homelessINK presents...    
New York City.

     New York 2¢ >A Point of View<

Motherless mONKEY

Motherless Monkeys

...monkey infants were reared without any contact whatsoever from birth on. The infants were isolated for periods that ranged from three months to one year. During this time, the infants saw no living creature, not even a human hand.

If you are in New York City you have made it!
That doesn't mean you have it made. Far from it. You have to work to make it yourself. It just means that this is the place to start. You are home. In the "now" of civilization. All "roads" connect to Manhattan. Madison Avenue is wide-spread and Wall Street is deep pockets. Hollywood comes to New York for a reality check.

Oh yeah, the U.N. is here too!

All right, if not a rational explanation, then try for a lucid one. This from the Village Voice

Giving credit where credit is due. The Times scores a point.

Reporters aren't allowed inside the E.A.U. or even near its doors, but I did manage a brief visit inside the one-story brick building early this past winter. A series of windowless rooms, it has the bright, 24-hour feel of a casino.

If you have enough discretionary income to buy tickets to hit shows, concerts or sporting events, then you are in a position to help "homeless" people make a "home" in New York City.

You are also able to save some of your money in exchange for some of your time.

To do this join a surveyINK Survey Group.

Your participation will give you access to most "anything that happens".. This means tickets to most any theatrical event, sporting event or concert in New York City.

You will also earn points toward discounted pricing on premium seating to events of your choosing.

These survey groups will be kept to a limited number of participants.

You have a realistic chance to get the free tickets awarded on a random basis.

Ticket points, awarded for exceptional answers or clever observations, will give added punch to your entertainment dollar by upgrading the quality of your seating.

Call and ask about currently available tickets and information about openings in on-going and upcoming surveys.

Homeless People, create waste as a by-product of any activity they may regularly perform. They and their waste accumulate, like so much compost, but not as useful, and far more malodorous. The more "homeless" people that gather the more the situation stinks. This is where it seems one might start if there were to be a dialouge, rather than a diktat.

If you are intending on working with someone you would want them groomed, and and up to the standards you hold in your "game". If you intend to isolate and eliminate someone from the situation as quickly as you can, then... "it matters not the nature of your product."

As long as you think they are off to "somewhere else" it's not your problem. What if there is no "somewhere else"? What if the planet was like a boat? What happens if you put all the homeless into one spot and line them up to wait... the boat would tip over. This comes about because unlike animals in a natural habitat, homeless people are entraped. There is only an unspeakable place for them in this ecologicaly incomplete economic system.

What's needed here is a orderly system for maintaining a minimum standard of hygenic propriety. This acceptable standard should not be tied to economic factors and should be considered as important as the right to vote.

Simply put, we are talking readily available public bathing facilities. No membership required. No "program" as a prerequisite.
Homeless:
Homeless people appear and disapear randomly throughout society.

This accounts for the broad range of humanity that one can find in the "homeless" population. In theory this happens at an even distribution, it can happen to anybody equally... that means "good" people as well as "bad" people. It happens suddenly. The moment when all attempts at saving the situation have failed AND the person realizes they blew it. It is usualy comes as surprize to those so afflicted.

But then... after a time the "homelessness" wears off, one settles and works their way through and out, or whatever, the person "gets over it". But meanwhile "back at the ranch"... somewhere another homeless person appears. That is why there are so many different people.

A brief aside about the relativity of luck. An easy example is a broken leg that can spoil the plans of a rich man, or, finding twenty dollars when penniless and hungry and homeless. Which is the luckier of the two, the rich one or the poor one? Happiness and pain are relative and what you consider to be fortunate may not be so for the other guy, or gal. What if the broken leg got you out of a bad marriage or you spent the twenty on bad drugs and died, what then? Who's lucky?

Random events like the particles of gas contained in a balloon.



Statistically a certain number will impact on the interior surface at any given instant, then to be replaced by others an instant later... it is not indiviual atoms holding the balloon out, like little Dutch boys with a finger in the dyke. It is the random action of all of them.

Homeless or not!

When dealing with real people, in real situations, this term, "homeless", is misleading and of little or no practical use. The way it is now it is constantly being redefined toward whatever is convinient. People appear as homeless suddenly. Even to themselves it is usualy comes as surprize. And then... after a time they disappear (the person "gets over it"). But meanwhile "back at the ranch"... another homeless person appears.

Random events like particles of a gas in a balloon.

Statistically a certain number will impact on the interior surface at any given instant, then to be replaced by others an instant later... it is not indiviual atoms holding the balloon out, like little Dutch boys with a finger in the dyke. It is the random action of all of them.

Homeless or not!

The common all-embracing use of the word is taken to mean... "people who depend on city services"... "people who don't pay rent"... or people seeking shelter on "public property" and making unautorized use of "private" spaces. Along with all this there is the underlying premise that these "homeless" intend to stay in the circumstances they are in, for a period indefinite and extended

wHAT DOES the
hEiSENBERG
uNCERTAINTY pRINCIPLE Have TO DO With
THE HOMELESS CONDITION...
In New York cITY?

"isolated" physical subsystems need not possess "properties" in their own right.

To date none of these experiments has produced any evidence for the breakdown of quantum mechanics. Indeed, in experiments where the parameters are well controlled, the agreement between experiment and the predictions of quantum theory has been quite satisfying. However, it is important to appreciate that no experiment to date has definitively excluded a "macrorealistic" view of the world in which a macroscopic object is in a definite macroscopic state at all times. The macrorealistic view is, needless to say, incompatible with the quantum picture."

http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/
begins...
    HOPE 2004 found:
  • • 2,694 street homeless individuals in Manhattan, Brooklyn and Staten Island.
  • • One of two individuals were on Manhattan streets, one of five were in subway cars or in subway stations, and one of seven were women.
  • •This year’s survey produced the second annual estimate for Manhattan. Results of this year’s survey found no significant difference in the number of unsheltered street homeless individuals in Manhattan streets (1,560 individuals in ’03 vs. 1,482 individuals in ’04). However, the total number of single adults in municipal shelters rose significantly (8,323 in ’03 vs. 8,963 in ’04).
  • •For the second year in a row, no homeless children were on the streets or in other public places on the night of the survey.
Homeless people do not remain psycologicaly "homeless" for long. Even though they "know" it is temporary, their shelter becomes a "home"!
"Those currently trapped in the EAU understand. "I can see how it happened," said 15-year-old Herbert R. Bennett Jr., who's been haplessly impounded in the EAU for months. "This place is mad stressful." Consider the page on Teritoriality. After months in a single place the only way to keep people from thinking and acting like they were "home", is to keep them traumatized.

"Anywhere else but the shelter", is the idea behind this proceedure. And it is fertile ground for slop-sink homeless thinking. The staff as well as the "clients" suffer from this. For the staff it is an excuse to mistreat people because they are a commodity to be "processed".

Helter Shelter-Inside the City's Dreaded Dumping Ground for the Homeless- by Geoffrey Gray-August 21 - 27, 2002- "Here, parents and small children sleep on the floor, on benches, and in office chairs, without air-conditioning. The crowd is triple what the fire code allows. People stuck here said blankets are rarely provided, sandwich meat is sometimes served spoiled, and babies have been getting food poisoning. Drinking water is scarce, and little piles of shit constantly turn up on the benches. "

This is in New York City, less than two years ago. My question to Mayor Mike and Commissioner Gibbs is... "What is there to improve?".

The Comish jokes in the press that homelessness is "not rocket science", and this is partly true, but misleading.

First. Building a system, founding a community, or funding building maintenence to do one thing or another, is not what we what we are talking about. The shelter facilities are like City Hall or the Mayor's mansion. Are there "little piles" of poop turning up there? If they do, is it difficult is it to clean them up?   No.

It is the quality of the available behavioral options, what actions people are forced to take due to environmental conditions, that creates this squalidity.

On the other hand, as with rocket science people's lives are at stake in the outcome. Extra care must be taken because the outcome is not reversible and there are limited windows for success.

Because life and death consequences are at stake, rocket scientists take care in what they do. It is important. Brain, heart, or any surgery. How about the brakes on your car or the school bus? What makes the "homeless" so inconsequential as people?

They matter enough to provide her with a job. New York City spent 600m in 200* to provide a shelter that leaks homeless people into the street.
Like particles, homeless people appear and then disappear, they are of extremely short duration. What happens is that an individual formalizes into a "homeless" situation. Their personal moorings having been severed, they were socially cut loose. Naturaly they seek to re-establish them.

This is evident in what would be described as the "nesting" behavior that asserts itself. Such behavior results in the accumulation of stuff around people: your desk at work, slips of paper and scribbled numbers in your pocket.

As time advances and the homelessness "decays" into the situation specific to the entraped individual... where their personal "wave" has collapsed.

Now you see them engaged in seeking to orchestrate some personal order within the social turmoil that is high-density teritorial competition.

This under the crippling limitation of an undifined conceptual model of what it is to be "homeless". Yet all entanglements are stigmatized by ones "homelessness".

The City on the other hand, can not abide this wave collapse. If too many homeless people appear in any given area, the city has a "homeless situation". Witness the shelters. They are not designed to "shelter" (humanely or otherwise). They are designed as containment facilities.

What happens when the free range and "shelter resistant" people start measuring a place for themselves, is that the City must then re-accelerate them in order to disperse the "homeless" energy: so that it cannot build into localized power. Keep them in motion, if not, then their actual numbers would become apparent. As their mass builds, and the gravity of the situation becomes critical, it begins to distort established political interests. ***

"This is where we examine "quantum effects" on a shattered individual, and how they "play out" socially and economically in New York City"

Whether or not this analogy can be developed into a "model" is yet to be seen. So far from what I see, the "Alice in Wonderland" like Quantum world, is pretty much a "common sense" description of the everyday social life of humans.

Tell me what I'm missing? The Spin? The "wave collapse"? Maybe social and personal "entanglements"? Or my favorite, the "black hole of poverty". The homeless are like posts along a fence. Made rigid and frozen in a long line of poverty.


When it comes to "black holes": a trap avoided is better than one escaped.



http://homelessink.tripod.com/mocamint.gif
Head: Where it begins... where it finishes.
You can help homelessINK pay for
start-up costs and expenses by using
Your help is both needed and appreciated.
*
*
*
*
If anyone has a copy

homelessINK

could use one
pocket n. pockets < 'pâkit > : 1. A small pouch in a garment for
 carrying small articles. 2. A supply of money; 
"they dipped into the taxpayers' pockets." 
[ETYM: Old Eng. poket, Prov. French & Old Fren. 
poquette, French pochette, dim. from poque, pouque, 
French poche; probably of Teutonic origin.
 Related to Poke a pocket, and cf. 
Poach to cook eggs, to plunder, and Pouch.]

homelessECONOMICS

WHY CAN'T I GET TICKETS?
REPORT ON TICKET DISTRIBUTION PRACTICES

Did you ever wonder where the ticket-brokers of "hot" hit Broadway shows get those tickets?

Diggers!

"What are diggers?", you may be asking yourself. They are people who stand waiting in line for long hours to buy tickets. Usually, but not always they are homeless people!

In New York when tickets go on sale, the lines are long if it is an important event. Most likely the first tickets bought will be bought by a homeless person. Or, even more likely, the first one hundred ticket punches will be bought homeless people buying tickets for an agency.

People with productive jobs cannot afford to camp out all night (and somtimes for days, i.e., World Series tickets that freaquently go on sale in New York). This is why they pay the brokers a premium over the price of the ticket.

Easy example is the lawyer who makes $350 an hour. For such, an "over-nighter" would put the price in the range of a small car.

Yet the one-hundred and fifty dollars the homeless person earns make him rich for a day! (Location, location is everything. Same cardboard, in front of a theater, for a homeless person, sleep becomes over-night work.)

So at the bottom of the economic ticket chain, sits, a waiting homeless person

It's beauty is in it's completeness and simplicity.

What could be simpler than an egg?

But when you come down to it, what have you got?

It goes nowhere. Does nothing. If all you know is what you see, it's pointless. In and of it's self, it is useless.

This is what happens when you isolate, or "select out", a "homeless person". They go nowhere, and they do nothing.

Now why is that?

Yet, if you put the egg into a context, suddenly...

...you have an uderstanding. If you are a farmer, it's next years chicken. For me it's breakfast.

And so we see the homeless problem.

For the City it is to move them out of "public" areas that they can leagaly occupy.
They are next years butter for this years bread.

For me it's understanding why, if you are going to have homeless people, why won't you let them be clean? Perhaps give them a place to rest? A little peace, alittle Time to think.

As objectified and particularized, homeless people are a problem because there is no contextual understanding.

Given the Schrodinger/Heisenberg! "spin" they are part of a social wave, and ongoing and active work of public developement and social improvement, or not. High Anxiety

dictionary
WORD RESOURCES.

An encyclopedia of current events
 with news feeds and research links 
...connecting the dots...
SHELTER:

commingSOON...
Shelter From the Storm a thin cardboard box

background="http://homelessink.tripod.com/31green.gif">

Between Hope and Hard Times:

New York's Working Families in Economic Distress

"If the American Dream can be said to have a home, it’s New York. The rich history of the state stretches from revolutionary times through the tremendous economic expansion of the Erie Canal to the construction of audacious skyscrapers and the greatest wealth-generating apparatus the world has ever seen. For Irish families fleeing the potato famine of the 1840s, for African- Americans trekking north during the Great Migration of the 20th century, and for immigrants today arriving from all corners of the globe, New York has always embodied American aspirations for a better life."

"One of the largely hidden benefits of welfare reform in the mid-1990s was that it finally helped demolish the pernicious myth of the “parasitic poor.” As millions of single mothers and others joined the workforce, a more accurate image emerged: ambitious, hard-working Americans who wanted to join the mainstream of working life and feel the pride of caring for themselves and their families. In a sense, welfare reform issued the same challenge as always to the worst-off in our society: Make the often-arduous efforts to improve yourselves and it will pay dividends. If we as a society fail to live up to our end of that bargain, we let down not only those millions fighting every day to improve their own lives, but our own shared faith that such efforts should be rewarded."

 David J. Fischer, Tara Colton, 
Neil S. Kleiman and Karen Schimke  
 CENTER FOR AN URBAN FUTURE

Behavior is the place where changes and improvements are made in the quality of ones life

Question:

How many people does it take the Mayor to count one homeless guy?

Answer:

Eleven or more.
  • six volunteers
  • at least one city city official
  • three people from a television crew
  • and one crack reporter from the New York Times.
In fact we can not know exactly how many people it would take the Mayor to find one homeless person. You see, the number would be hypothetical. Technically the Mayor Mike still has to keep counting. Because, if it takes eleven people (plus possible undocumented accomplices) to find five people: that would be 0.45454545454545453 homeless people each of these ghost hunters found. That means there are missing homeless.

Furthermore this is the same conclusion INK comes to when looking at the gross numbers City Hall is feeding everyone through the media. Read on...

After counting all of the five (5) homeless people they could find by 3a.m. and, "as a light snow was beginning to fall" they decided to "wrap it up an hour early". This is part one of a fast breaking story. Part one begins three years ago, but only now can it be told. What has the New York Times to do with
the first homeless count in New York City.

By the end of the Nineteenth Century, this attitude has been turned on its head. Loggers, hunters, and farmers began the century being portrayed as heroes in the battle against the dark wilderness; they ended it as "pirates of the forest"[16] who plundered a defenseless Mother Nature. New York voters came to believe in protection so strongly that in 1894, they approved a new clause in the state Constitution designating hundreds of thousands of state-owned land "forever wild."

Two movements were at the root of this reversal. The first was a broad shift in public attitudes. Early in the century, a few artists and writers in Europe and New York City began portraying wilderness as a treasure unique to America. Near mid-century, urban design experts and physicians in New York and Boston began prescribing fresh air, sunshine, and the solitude of wide-open spaces for illnesses that ranged from consumption to insanity. Sanitariums were built in pastoral settings, including a vast mental hospital on Seneca Lake and a tuberculosis treatment center in Saranac Lake. Belief in the positive benefits of wild landscapes had become mainstream by 1883, when Niagara Falls became America’s second state park, and was confirmed in 1885, when the state created its Forest Preserve. During the latter part of the century, naturalists and moral philosophers even began arguing that mankind had an obligation to treat wild birds and animals in a humane manner -- and that nature had a right to exist that was separate from mankind.

The second movement was based in science and economics. New York’s virgin forests were cut down rapidly and brutally, with severe side effects. In the 1860s, so much of the state had been poorly logged that erosion was pouring silt into the Mohawk and Hudson Rivers, threatening a transportation network that was vital to New York City. In 1864, George Perkins Marsh gave voice to the growing concern. In his book Man and Nature, Marsh argued that many ancient civilizations had failed because they stripped the earth bare with little regard for the future[17]. The book became a central rallying point for those who believed that uncontrolled logging would ruin the state. Severe fires in the logged-over land, many caused by cinders from passing trains, deepened the sense of alarm. In the end, the successful campaign for the Forest Preserve depended on a rare alliance between nature-lovers, physicians, and the Chamber of Commerce.

****



Make your own free website on Tripod.com
http://homelessink.tripod.com/a9grid.gif

Truth:  Cleanses those who use it! "Use it  like Water."

STROOP
homelessINK

Here in New York City we have an "official" count that continues to muffle the truth. City Says 2005:


--------------------
City tracks hidden homeless
--------------------

Head count will help Chicago vie for 
millions in federal funds

By Patrick Rucker
Tribune staff reporter

January 29, 2005

The woman peeked out from a cardboard parapet as Jim Bracey strode toward her makeshift home among the litter and scattering rats under the Dan Ryan Expressway.

"This is Betty's house," Bracey said.

Bracey, a Salvation Army chaplain, has visited the spot a hundred times before. This time he brought along a clipboard.

For three hours in the bitter cold Thursday night, Bracey and some 400 census takers from the city of Chicago and 11 non-profit agencies roamed dark urban corners to find the most elusive homeless.

The head count was replicated in dozens of cities in the nation this week to help the Department of Housing and Urban Development decide how it will allocate $1.4 billion in federal aid.

HUD has never before sought such a standardized count of the nation's homeless, said department spokesman Brian Sullivan. "It is a way for us to get uniformity in the data," Sullivan said.

Chicago received about $40 million in HUD funding for homelessness last year--over half of the state's allotment of $73 million. City officials estimate there are 9,600 homeless people in Chicago; activists for the homeless estimate the population at about 15,000 in a city with only 6,000 beds at shelters.

Now that the census is done, researchers from the city Department of Human Services and Roosevelt University's Institute for Metropolitan Affairs will process the raw data into hard numbers.

That process is likely to take several weeks, human services officials said. Chicago's numbers will be added to those of Miami, Los Angeles, Oklahoma City and dozens of other municipalities that conducted a "point in time" snapshot of their homeless problem.

"Because of the way we collected the data--using a sampling method--it will be several weeks before we have any conclusions," said Cindy Collins, director of grants and research for the Human Services Department. She helped develop the census questionnaire and sampling methodology and will help with the analysis.

Bracey led a band of about eight volunteers who found 12 homeless people, mostly men, while searching on foot under bridges and highway overpasses and in abandoned buildings around the city's University Village and Pilsen neighborhoods.

Betty Strickland's cardboard lean-to was their first stop. They found her there, along with her companion, Willie, sitting next to a small fire.

A cheerful woman of 43, Strickland emerged wearing six sweaters and an overcoat.

"I'm just trying to stay warm," Strickland said with a half-smile, her nook packed with six blankets.

On CTA trains and buses, in emergency rooms, late-night laundries and restaurants, the volunteer canvassers were on the lookout for people like Strickland--the unseen homeless who routinely eschew shelters and live rough on the street no matter what their health is, no matter what the weather.

According to HUD guidelines, the homeless count was conducted in the final week of January--when weather is bitter and shelters are near capacity.

When the Chicago volunteers came upon a willing subject, they interviewed the homeless person according to an 18-point questionnaire on lifestyle, health and personal history.

Homeless people who were found sleeping or who declined to cooperate also were noted in the tally.

Besides helping city officials compete for HUD funding, the census information is expected to yield clues to help realize Mayor Richard Daley's campaign to end homelessness in 10 years--an initiative that started in 2003.

"Once we get the data analyzed, it will inform our work immediately," said Ellen Sahli, Daley's liaison on homelessness and supportive housing. "The HUD application is only part of its usefulness."

Bracey, once homeless himself, looked for telltale signs that a homeless person was living nearby, such as errant grocery carts, stray bicycles, piles of debris and unexplained smoke rising from unlikely spaces.

"I've seen people in corners and crevices that you'd never expect someone could sleep," Bracey said.

He has found people under train trestles and overturned canoes, in trash bins and freight cars.

On nights like Thursday, when the temperature dropped to 14 degrees, many indigent people go to city warming centers or other indoor sites.

Those who remain on the streets are some of the least likely to seek public aid, Bracey said. They may be dealing with mental illness, fear, dedication to a companion, drug dependency or pride.

Knowing how many people are unwilling to seek help is crucial to eliminating homelessness, Sahli said.

"That information is important for designing new programs," she said. "Why aren't people using shelters? What is the need there that we are not responding to?"

In the conventional view, shelters are the gateway to getting homeless people access to other services.

"Our long-term goal is to get these people into permanent housing, but we believe part of doing that means finding them where they are," Sahli said.

According to the HUD guidelines, volunteers counted people living in conditions considered "unfit for human habitation."

That description is apt for the home Betty Strickland and her companion have made for themselves, Bracey said.

"I've seen people in these situations before. Often it takes a tragedy--like one of them dying--before people like that come in. I hope it does not come to that."

Copyright (c) 2005, Chicago Tribune

"From a population of about 33,000 in 1790, New York City had grown to a metropolis of nearly 400,000 by 1845. Desperately poor immigrants packed into a city that still extended no farther north than 14th Street. The old constable system, which had policed New York since the days of the Dutch, was simply overwhelmed by a new set of policing problems: growing slums, rising crime and frequent rioting. There were so many public disturbances in 1834 that it became known as "The Year of the Riots." The worst problems centered on the Bowery and the notorious Five Points neighborhood which contemporaries called "a rendezvous for thieves and prostitutes" and which was said to be the scene of a murder a night."

 http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/
html/nypd/html/3100/retro.html
Some Background
from Columbia 
School of
Journalism

Since the early 20th century, the various administrations of New York City have restructured the social service bureaucracy over and over, attempting to provide support to the city's poorest citizens. At the turn of the century, the agency was called the Department of Public Charities. It later became the Department of Welfare and eventually the Human Resources Administration. Yet with each restructuring, the core deficiencies of the system have remained the same, and people have been left without the support they need to escape poverty. Even in the midst of the unprecedented wealth of the twenty-first century, the city's public assistance system today is plagued by many of the same problems it faced 50 years ago. According to dozens of academic and government reports, lawsuits, audits and interviews with former and current social service administrators and employees, the HRA has been beset by overloaded and under-trained caseworkers, inadequate equipment and facilities, lack of oversight of contractors and breakdowns in communication within and between city agencies. Other than some steps taken by Eggleston and the previous HRA Commissioner, Jason Turner, to improve the agency's computer systems, intra-agency communication and staff training, many of the core problems had not changed by the spring of 2003. The most impoverished New Yorkers have to deal with this agency in order to get the food, medicine and other services they need to survive. HRA's dysfunction has only added to the dysfunction of the lives of the poor.

homelessINK
"When One Door Closes... "
Homeless Family, circa. 1930
http://albethere.tripod.com/tendollardeal.html

Oppression and Social Intervention

Ira Goldenberg/Nelson Hall Chicago/1978

Your Chance To Win!
Real tickets. Real Survey.

begins...

People, create waste as a by-product of any activity they may regularly perform. They and their waste accumulate, like so much compost, but not as useful, and far more malodorous. This is why great pains are taken to to teach children to groom themselves.

The more "homeless" people gather in one place the more a situation stinks. This is because it is not seemly to groom in public, and some natural personal behavior that is quite acceptable in private is forbidden and punished if done in public.

If you are "really" going to set to work on ending homelessness, this is where it seems one might start. As a practical matter. Think, a shower and clean sox. How it makes you feel in the morning... and how it makes you feel if you miss it. Then try to smile while you shake hands with someone (if you care to get that close) after not having showered or removed from your body any clothing for a week.

If that seems a lot just sleep with your clothes on, and then, go though a single day. Do it twice. The physical relief and well being you feel is not a luxury, it is.. health.

Need I say more? Feeling good is not a matter of ornament. If you are healthy you feel good. It's very much like breathing, you don't know how good you feel until you are stopped. If there were to be a dialouge between the homeless who are "encouraged" to obey the Mayor's...

begins...

What if instead of just the homeless on the street Billionaire Mike decided to end middle-classness in parts of this City if not everywhere? The subways would be just fine, if only butlers, nannies and houseboys were here to use them. The consumers who come to the city for the pretend tour, will have ample cab availability, because everyone else will have a car and driver.

This is what is lost in the hype. Homelessness is a life-style. Where you go, who you see, what you do. these are things that fill real days. What the Mayor is doing is withdrawing resources from those in need in order to provide something ten years down the line. That's like telling a drowning man, "You see this air I'm giving you now? You can get it over there later. If you make it!"

Those dependant on his integrity have no choice. But those who chose freedom over oppression will not come off the streets. And if you are concerned about your tax money, rest assured that it will be spent.

Consider the impossibility of such a foolish claim. If you took all the people off the street in an instant, poof, over time more will fill the vacumn created. What the mayor is doing is preperatory propganda to mislead the public, thus allowing him to use force and intimidation to coerce the people on the street into giving up their freedom.

He offers nothing in return for this loss of freedom. Just confinement. Where once you had a daily life that God presented to you "live" and fresh, now all opportunity is filtered though a "program".

From what I see, the "shelter" life-style the Mayor dictates for anyone not in his "they count" class of people, produces dirty, unhappy, and pointless people. Whereas: the people living in the street are clever and self-starting enough to keep up economically with the rest of New York while managing to live without private personal shelter.

every one should come clean.

If you are intending on working with someone you would want them groomed, and and up to the standards you hold in your "game". If you intend to isolate and eliminate someone from the situation as quickly as you can, then... "good ridance to bad rubbish."

As long as you think they are off to "somewhere else" it's not your problem. What if there is no "somewhere else"? What if the planet was like a boat? What happens if you put all the homeless into one spot and line them up to wait... the boat would tip over. This comes about because unlike animals in a natural habitat, homeless people are entraped. There is only an unspeakable place for them in this ecologicaly incomplete economic system.

What's needed here is a orderly system for maintaining a minimum standard of hygenic propriety. This acceptable standard should not be tied to economic factors and should be considered as important as the right to vote.

Simply put, we are talking readily available public bathing facilities. No membership required. No "program" as a prerequisite.
close

"An acceptable interpretation should establish precise links between our formal description of physical processes and the events taking place in the three-dimensional space we ‘see’ around us."




begins

"Like the nonsensical idea that spices were used to disguise the taste of rotten meat, the idea that bathing was forbidden and/or wiped out between the fall of Rome and the Enlightenment has been touted by many gullible writers, including Smithsonian magazine.

"However, even the Smithsonian in the person of Jay Stuller has to admit that "Gregory the Great, the first monk to become pope, allowed Sunday baths and even commended them, so long as they didn't become a 'time-wasting luxury' . . . medieval nobility routinely washed their hands before and after meals.

"Etiquette guides of the age insisted that teeth, face and hands be cleaned each morning. Shallow basins and water jugs for washing hair were found in most manor houses, as was the occasional communal tub..."

A Short History of Bathing